Derek Webb’s new CD is out, and it’s all sorts of controversial. I’ve only listened to the song where he swears a couple times, and I’m not so offended. That’s probably because I swear a couple times, too.
Anyway, I want to revisit some old DW, because I think Christians still need to get good and offended by these lyrics long before they get offended by a couple of swear words. And by “offended,” I mean, “Offended enough to take a good look at ourselves and change.”
poverty is so hard to see
when it’s only on your tv and twenty miles across town
where we’re all living so good
that we moved out of Jesus’ neighborhood
where he’s hungry and not feeling so good
from going through our trash [...]so what must we do
here in the west we want to follow you
we speak the language and we keep all the rules
even a few we made up
come on and follow me
but sell your house, sell your suv
sell your stocks, sell your security
and give it to the poor (“Rich Young Ruler”)i repent, i repent of my pursuit of america’s dream
i repent, i repent of living like i deserve anything
of my house, my fence, my kids, my wife
in our suburb where we’re safe and white
i am wrong and of these things i repent (“I Repent”)
I remember hearing Derek sing the latter song, as well as the scandalous “Wedding Dress,” at a local suburban evangelical church a few years ago. When he sang the words, “So could you love this bastard child?”, the man sitting in front of us was visibly offended.
Oh, for the lifestyle convenience of being able to get all offended at the word “bastard.” The reason so many “safe” Christians spend all our time being offended is that our lives have become so comfortable – like the rich young ruler’s – that we’re not able to sell our made-up rules and our expensive comforts and go where Jesus is sick on the street.
There’d be nothing wrong with suburban Christianity if it weren’t so damn suburban. But there’s little that is counter-cultural about it. It’s cozy and easy. It’s just like lots of urban ministry, which completely abandons the gospel for some sort of liberal political agenda. If the gospel ain’t rattling people, it ain’t the gospel.
I am tired – very tired – of how quickly we evangelicals justify our absurd wealth (I’m including myself here) with reminders that it’s the love of money, not money itself, that is evil; or that Abraham was rich; or whatever other thing makes us feel better about not giving to the poor. If you’re wealthy and truly giving sacrificially – let’s put flesh and bones on that: giving up the new car, the pool, the GAP or Banana Republic clothes, the unneeded new stylish jacket – and giving to people who are drugged out, out of hope, selling their bodies because they can’t pay for food for their kids, selling drugs for the same reason, robbing people’s houses in desperation, or living on the street in the dead chill of a Rochester winter, then you can make all those true, qualifying statement about wealth. I, for one, am done reciting those things for a while.
The challenge still comes directly from Jesus: sell all you have and give to the poor. It is impossible for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven.
The Rich Young Ruler needs to repent. And I need to remember that I am that Rich Young Ruler in more ways than I probably realize.










{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
I happened to run into the link below via the Daily Dish right after reading this post.
http://www.slate.com/id/2222495/pagenum/all/#p2
It discusses how Prosperity Theology fits culturally into current economic problems. I don’t know the movement well, but what I’ve heard, read, and seen on the topic leads me to see it as a repackaged way of saying that “If you’re poor, it’s your fault, because you ticked off God somehow.”
The piece does come from Slate, so take its agenda however you like. And as much as I like some stuff in Slate, this reads more as a hit piece aimed in Joel Osteen’s general direction.
I just thought it interesting in light of your post this morning.
I did lots of research on the health/wealth “gospel” years ago. Even went to a Benny Hinn crusade to watch it first hand. It’s ugly stuff.
That’s exactly what it is: If you’re sick or poor, it’s either because you don’t have enough faith, or God’s punishing you for something. God wants all people rich and healthy.
Wow! What a powerful post Travis. Great points, and convicting words.
I think he’s doing a concert in Syracuse on the 25th. http://www.breakthechain.us/
Didn’t know about that show! Probably a long shot, as we’re in Chautauqua the night before for a Gordon Lightfoot show. I missed DW last time he came around, because it was the week after Sophia was born.
This guy’s lyrics read a little more like Dylan than the standard, poppy quasi-rock Christian stuff played around here.
I confess the sound of that music drives me nuts for the same reason Nickelback does. It’s probably unfair of me to do so, but I can’t help equating that sound to surface-deep dreck that just doesn’t move me at all. I like a little pain in my music. This guy’s lyrics speak to that a bit.
I hate 99% of what gets played on Christian radio stations, and the first part of that is how cheesy the music is; the second is how bad the lyrics are.
Christian radio stations won’t play Derek Webb.
Check this out for pain, edgy, and stuff that nice Christian radio won’t play. He got into a huge dispute with his record label over this one.
Travis, I like the lyrics quite a bit. The musical-style I can live with. I’m more Ryan Adams/Ben Harper/Son Volt/Norah Jones in my musical stylings — especially when I played guitar more regularly. I used to play quite a bit in high school and college.
Four part-time teaching positions and PhD work have, uh, put my Strats and Tele under my bed for a while. I do miss it — a lot.
To draw another comparison, his lyrics in this song also remind me a bit of 80’s U2 — when they were younger, kinda pissed off, and good. It’s interesting to me that his label and “mainstream” Christian radio find him so transgressive.
I imagine his sentiments also strike some of his audience as rather more “liberal” than they’re comfortable with, not that the term actually means all that much.
Perhaps there is some Rich Young Ruler stuff in your heart, but we’ve got to also watch out for the Older Brother stuff, bro. We are not living the life that we deserve, nor do we have the power to determine the will of the Father in others’ lives. We can speak Biblically about what God calls Christians toward, as well as away from; but contextualization is everything in that matter. There is no arrival in this journey and though we’d like to see more people come along, we have to admit that we cling even more viscerally to comforts that we might tend to call others to leave behind. I would note that there are many “comfortable” Christians right in our neighborhood, who have been lulled into comfort by other forces. Suburbia does not have the market cornered on spiritual malaise.
Yup – I’m one of those comfortable Christians on our street, if you hadn’t noticed by the $12,000 in remodeling we just had done.
I see where you’re getting the “older brother” stuff from in this post, and I just re-worded a thing or two, because I see how it was coming across. Not at all as I intended.
I’m certainly not meaning to be “older brother,” and there’s nothing “older brother” about reminding myself and others about Jesus’ teaching on wealth. And I noted at least one of the pitfalls of urban ministry as well.
Dude…I wasn’t talking about you. You’re my bro. I don’t see you as “lulled into comfort.” I was talking about the obvious neglect of spiritually “uncomfortable” people in our neighborhood by spiritually “comfortable” churches in our neighborhood. Sorry for confusion.
Dude, I know you weren’t! I was just trying to bring the conversation even closer to home, because I agreed with your thoughts about having to be careful about being the “older brother.” No worries, man.